Andrew Jackson Good Or Bad President Essay, Cover Letter Lamaran Kerja Email, Popular Editor Services For Mba, Trend Essay Topics Of all presidential reputations, Andrew Jackson’s is perhaps the most difficult to summarize or explain. Most Americans recognize his name, though most probably know him (in the words of a famous song) as the general who “fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans” in rather than as a two-term president of the United States from to Jul 09, · Andrew Jackson was a Lawyer and a landowner. He was the first person from the west to be elected as a member of the Senate and later the president of the United States. As many individuals know he became a national war hero after defeating the British in the battle of New Orleans during the war of , which is what
Andrew Jackson: Life Before the Presidency | Miller Center
Indian Removal », andrew jackson essay. Jackson is the only president, and for that matter the only American, whose name graces a whole period in our history. Lincoln belongs in the Civil War era, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson in the Progressive era, Franklin Roosevelt in the era of the Great Depression, the New Deal, and World War II.
But the interval roughly from the s through s, between the aftermath of the War of and the coming of the Civil War, has often been known as the Jacksonian Era, or the Age of Jackson, andrew jackson essay. Washington was the Father of his country. Lincoln, Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt were war leaders who also not wholly coincidentally presided over dramatic changes in government. Andrew jackson essay led the country through no wars. In the state of South Carolina declared the tariff law unconstitutional and therefore null and void.
In assuming this right, independent of the Supreme Court or anybody else, to judge what the US Constitution meant and what federal laws had to be obeyed, South Carolina threatened the very viability of the federal union.
Although he was himself a southerner, no great friend of the tariff, and a South Carolina native, Jackson boldly faced down the nullifiers. Disunion by armed force is treason. Are you really ready to incur its guilt? Although he played no direct role in its passage, andrew jackson essay, Jackson took much credit for the compromise, and even many political opponents conceded it to him. In the secession andrew jackson essay thirty years later, Republicans—including Abraham Lincoln, an anti-Jackson partisan from his first entry into politics—hastened to invoke his example and quote his words, andrew jackson essay.
Secession is a dead issue, and commitment to an indivisible and permanent American nationhood is now so commonplace as to seem hardly worth remarking. That image has deep roots. Returning home, he published Democracy in America, still the most penetrating analysis of American society ever penned. De Tocqueville organized his exposition which in many respects was not at all flattering around two themes.
America, then, was democracy embodied—and Andrew Jackson was its exemplar. The image of Jackson as a quintessential product of American democracy has stuck. Yet always complicating it has been the interplay between the personal and andrew jackson essay political.
If Jackson is a potent democratic symbol, he is also a conflicted and polarizing one, andrew jackson essay. In his own lifetime he was adulated and despised far beyond any other American. To an amazing degree, historians today still feel visceral personal reactions to him, and praise or damn accordingly, andrew jackson essay. His lifelong political antagonist Henry Andrew jackson essay once likened him, not implausibly, to a tropical tornado.
Mixed in with these were episodes of insubordination, usurpation, uncontrolled temper, wanton violence, and scandal. Jackson vanquished enemies in battle everywhere and won a truly astonishing victory at New Orleans. As president he was, depending on whom one asked, either our greatest popular tribune or the closest we have come to an American Caesar. An adept manipulator of his own image, Jackson played a willing hand in fusing the political and the personal.
First as a candidate and then as president, he reordered the political landscape around his own popularity. Swept into office on a wave of genuine grassroots enthusiasm, Jackson labored successfully through eight years as president to reshape his personal following into an effective political apparatus—the Democratic Party, our first mass political party, which organized under his guidance.
Those conundrums endure, and the facts, or arguments, behind them would fill a book. One is his attack on corporate privilege and on the concentrated political influence of wealth.
Populists and other agrarian insurgents in the nineteenth century, and New Deal Democrats in the twentieth, claimed it as their birthright, andrew jackson essay. Writing in the wake of the Great Depression and the New Deal, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. made the Bank Veto the centerpiece of The Age of Jacksonthe foundational work of modern Jacksonian scholarship. To other recent scholars, though, the Bank Veto has seemed merely demagogic, while to most people outside the academy the whole Jacksonian struggle over banking grew to appear baffling and arcane, andrew jackson essay, divorced from our andrew jackson essay concerns.
All of that has suddenly changed. They are again often quoted, and his reputation has enjoyed, andrew jackson essay least for the moment, a sharp uptick. The symbolic freighting of this subject can hardly be overstated. It opens a door behind which one finds Jackson the archetypal Indian-hater, the slave owner, the overbearing male patriarch, and the frontiersman not as heroic pioneer but as imperialist, expropriator, and killer.
There is no doubt that removing the American Indians, andrew jackson essay, particularly those in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, was centrally important to Jackson, andrew jackson essay.
He claimed to be acting only on impulses of duty and philanthropy. American Indians could not, without violating the essential rights of sovereign states, remain where they were; their own self-preservation required quarantine from pernicious white influences; and the terms offered for their evacuation were reasonable and even generous.
Critics, then and since, have branded these as artful rationalizations to cover real motives of greed, racism, and land-lust. A handful of defenders andrew jackson essay apologists—most notably Jackson biographer Robert V. Remini—have dared to buck the tide, but for most scholars the question is not whether Jackson acted badly, but whether he acted so badly as to exclude considering anything else he might have done as palliation or excuse.
No simple conclusion offers itself. The one thing that seems certain is that Americans will continue to argue about him. Daniel Feller is Betty Lynn Hendrickson Professor of History and editor of The Papers of Andrew Jackson at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, andrew jackson essay.
He is the author of The Jacksonian Promise: America, — Gilder Lehrman Periods Period 1: Period 2: Period 3: Period 4: Period 5: Period 6: Period 7: Period 8: Period 9: - Present. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History Advanced Placement United States History Study Guide. Discussion 1. Login to post comments. Awesome Essay! So helpful in expanding my understanding of the Jacksonian Era!!! very detailed and informative. this essay provided a lot of research for me!
Add comment Login to post comments.
Andrew Jackson Long Essay Explanation
, time: 5:13Andrew Jackson: Campaigns and Elections | Miller Center
Of all presidential reputations, Andrew Jackson’s is perhaps the most difficult to summarize or explain. Most Americans recognize his name, though most probably know him (in the words of a famous song) as the general who “fought the bloody British in the town of New Orleans” in rather than as a two-term president of the United States from to Nov 21, · Essay on andrew jackson martin luther essay junior cert? | Essay on effects of cyclone Ratings 98 % () Essay on andrew jackson martin luther essay junior cert? Mar 03, · The decision in Worcester re-affirmed Federal sovereignty in those areas in which the Constitution specifically delegated authority to the Federal government. It was a restrain on state powers. Since Andrew Jackson was a Federal official, it was not something that impacted him. Phony history does not need to be repeated endlessly
No comments:
Post a Comment